CBLOL Split 2: separating a completed competition label from open contracts

The comparison behind the headline

LOS and FURIA still have qualifying open contracts in our October 4 data, priced at 57.9% and 42.5%. Riot’s published Split 2 page is marked completed. That combination calls for a settlement-status check, not an assumption that the tournament is about to begin. ^[1][2]

At our October 4 observation, the relevant open contracts read: LOS 57.9%; FURIA 42.5%. These are recorded market prices, not official outcome declarations. The event’s cumulative volume was $112,070; that measures turnover across this parent event, rather than money backing any one scenario. ^[1]

The detail that changes the question

The contract asks for the 2026 CBLOL Split 2 champion. Riot’s checked page labels a March–June Split 2, so the exact competition edition and its official final record must be matched before treating a later result or a similarly named split as decisive. ^[1][2]

What would strengthen or weaken the case

The LOS proposition is supported only by an official result establishing LOS as champion of the exact covered competition. A current open quote cannot substitute for that result, and this article does not claim to have verified the winning team.

The proposition is challenged by a qualifying official champion other than LOS. Results from a regular-season meeting, promotion event or another split would not answer the named championship question merely because the same teams appear.

The evidence that will settle it

The official CBLOL 2026 Split 2 winner controls settlement. If several teams are declared winners, the listed team name earliest alphabetically is selected. Riot information is the primary reference. ^[3]

Cancellation, postponement beyond December 31, 2026, 11:59 p.m. ET, or no winner declared in that window produces Other. An API-open flag says the contract remains open; it does not prove that competitive play remains unfinished. ^[3]